Description: Attribute NameDefinitionProject_IDEither Work Order number or Project ID Project_NameName of projectProj_LeadGroup that lead the construction of the project- Stormwater, Stormwater Evergreen, Streets, Water, Parks, or Other DescriptionShort description of project type and purpose.DOEDepartment of Engineering number, when applicable.Plan_NoPlan number, when applicable.Const_CostEstimated construction cost or cost of stormwater contribution to another department project. If no construction cost is available and a specific contract letter is referenced, this means that that overall contract was for several smaller projects and the overall cost cannot be broken down into individual projects costs.HyperlinkLink to plans in vault, if availableDate_CompleteMonth and year the project is substantially complete (functions as designed). If as built plans are available, date can be taken off the plans. For initial projects added into the feature class, only a year will be noted.CommentsField used for misc. information that doesn't fit into another columnHRO Majorcapacity improvementsHRO Safetysignage, lighting, guardrailsPipe Rehablining, point repair, relocating into ROWFlood Mitigationfocused on flood reduction to structures and/or propertiesChannel Improvementsincludes erosion mitigation & channel restoration projects
Description: Attribute NameDefinitionProject_IDEither Work Order number or Project ID Project_NameName of projectProj_LeadGroup that lead the construction of the project- Stormwater, Stormwater Evergreen, Streets, Water, Parks, or Other DescriptionShort description of project type and purpose.DOEDepartment of Engineering number, when applicable.Plan_NoPlan number, when applicable.Const_CostEstimated construction cost or cost of stormwater contribution to another department project. If no construction cost is available and a specific contract letter is referenced, this means that that overall contract was for several smaller projects and the overall cost cannot be broken down into individual projects costs.HyperlinkLink to plans in vault, if availableDate_CompleteMonth and year the project is substantially complete (functions as designed). If as built plans are available, date can be taken off the plans. For initial projects added into the feature class, only a year will be noted.CommentsField used for misc. information that doesn't fit into another columnHRO Major Capacity improvementsHRO SafetySignage, lighting, guardrailsPipe RehabLining, point repair, relocating into ROWFlood MitigationFocused on flood reduction to structures and/or propertiesChannel ImprovementsIncludes erosion mitigation & channel restoration projects
Description: Hazardous Roadway Overtopping Locations:SummaryThis layer contains the locations in City of Fort Worth, which experience repeated flooding due to water overtopping from adjacent streams and water ponding due to inadequate storm drain conveyance system. Most of these locations were originally identified and studied by Deotte, Inc. in 2005 in order to develop a risk based priority. This priority was being used by the city for managing flood warning systems. However, a need for a comprehensive program to improve the existing infrastructure at these locations was recognized in order to reduce the number of such frequently flooded locations which would in turn enable relocating the flood warning system to other locations that didn’t have a warning system before. This led to the development of Hazardous Roadway Overtopping Mitigation program based on a revised scoring methodology and while incorporating more storm water incidents observed in the city since Deotte’s study. Freese and Nichols assisted the city with reprioritizing the locations based on hazard, developing cost estimates, and scoring the feasibility of providing infrastructure improvements for high priority hazardous overtopping locations.Contact persons: Naven Kathuroju, Kiran KonduruDescriptionThe following are the metrics and the scoring system used to compute the hazard based score:Depth of Flow over Road:DepthPoints0-1’51’-3’8>3’10Frequency of Overtopping:FrequencyPointsInfrequent1Frequent4>3’10Stormwater Incidents:IncidentPointsComplaints0.5Rescue5Fatality10Flooding or Downstream Threat:DS ThreatPoints0-10%210-50%850-100%10The scoring based on these metrics is added and sorted among all locations for ranking purposes. A low rank or a high score indicates high hazard.Contact person: Naven Kathuroju, Kiran Konduru
Name: Storm Water Strategic Flood Mitigation Alternatives
Display Field: RepName
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPoint
Description: The following were the weights used for each of the prioritization criteria:CriterionNameMetricsOriginal WeightUpdated WeightD1Structural Flooding - ModelStructural Flooding Reduction Score30%15%D3Capital ReplacementGIS – BRE15%5%D4Cost EfficiencyScore to Cost Ratio15%15%S1Road Flooding – ModelRoad Hazard Reduction Score30%15%T1Structural Flooding –Reported IncidentsGIS – Drainage complaints10%25%V1Road Flooding – Reported IncidentsGIS – High Water Rescues and Fatalities0%25%The scoring based on these metrics is added and sorted among all locations for ranking purposes. A low rank or a high score indicates high hazard.Contact person: Naven Kathuroju, Kiran Konduru
Name: Storm Water Hazardous Roadway Overtopping AOIs
Display Field: Site_ID
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Each area of interest contains a polygon identifying the spatial extent and a corresponding attribute value that matches the Site ID of the HRO.
Name: Storm Water Strategic Flood Mitigation Alternatives AOIs
Display Field: RepName
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Each area of interest contains a polygon identifying the spatial extent and a corresponding attribute value that matches the database ID of the project.Contact person: Naven Kathuroju, Kiran Konduru
Description: This is a model built by the Trust for the Public Land utilizing numerous GIS data sets from the city, program partners, and government agencies. It encompasses seven main goal areas: Ecosystem Preservation; Stream, River, and Lake Health; Community Health; Recreation; Flood Control; Equitable Access to Open Space; and Economic Development. Each of the goal areas was weighted according to stakeholder and public feedback to produce the overall Combined Open Space Priorities. The model is run once per year when updated parcel data is available.
Copyright Text: Trust for Public Land, Texas Trees Foundation, Tarrant Regional Water District,
North Central Texas Council of Governments, CFW, EPA
Description: This layer is a subset of the floodplain_cfw_studies layer. As the City of Fort Worth (city) develops its urban flood risk identification tools, the city created Potential High-Water Areas (PHWA) across the entire City and ETJ areas for 1-, 5-, and 100-year storm events based on Atlas 14 precipitation data. These models were developed in HEC-RAS using a high-level Rain-on-Grid (ROG) analysis with the latest available 2019 LIDAR data and NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall data from the April 2020 iSWM manual to generate 1-, 5-, and 100-year outputs. The models were designed to account for the sub-surface storm drain network capacities using GIS asset information. Over 1,000 cross-drainage structures, not in the GIS asset information, were visually measured using EagleView software and incorporated into the models.This PHWA floodplain (shapefile) developed from this model was run through a GIS-based cleanup process to refine the boundary. These GIS steps aim to remove excessive noise, eliminate internal voids, evaluate isolated polygons, and smoothen the external polygon boundary to make the mapping output aesthetically pleasing and easier to use. The parameters used in the workflow process to perform the cleaning and smoothening steps were fine-tuned to work universally across all PHWA boundaries. Results were compared to the HEC-RAS ROG output data for general shape conformance and major approximations due to computer processing and the parameters were found to be universally acceptable for all PHWA areas across the city.
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Reported Groundwater seepage locations from customers and residents.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>