{
 "culture": "en-US",
 "name": "",
 "guid": "",
 "catalogPath": "",
 "snippet": "",
 "description": "The following were the weights used for each of the prioritization criteria:CriterionNameMetricsOriginal WeightUpdated WeightD1Structural Flooding - ModelStructural Flooding Reduction Score30%15%D3Capital ReplacementGIS \u2013 BRE15%5%D4Cost EfficiencyScore to Cost Ratio15%15%S1Road Flooding \u2013 ModelRoad Hazard Reduction Score30%15%T1Structural Flooding \u2013Reported IncidentsGIS \u2013 Drainage complaints10%25%V1Road Flooding \u2013 Reported IncidentsGIS \u2013 High Water Rescues and Fatalities0%25%The scoring based on these metrics is added and sorted among all locations for ranking purposes. A low rank or a high score indicates high hazard.Contact person: Naven Kathuroju, Kiran Konduru",
 "summary": "",
 "title": "Strategic Flood Mitigation Alternatives",
 "tags": [],
 "type": "",
 "typeKeywords": [],
 "thumbnail": "",
 "url": "",
 "minScale": 0,
 "maxScale": 0,
 "spatialReference": "",
 "accessInformation": "Freese and Nichols",
 "licenseInfo": ""
}